PHD
  1. Algebra  1.1. Group Theory  1.1.1. Basic Properties of Groups  1.1.2. Subgroups  1.1.3. Cosets and Lagrange's Theorem  1.1.4. Normal Subgroups  1.1.5. Quotient Groups  1.1.6. Group Homomorphisms  1.1.7. Sylow Theorems  1.1.8. Free Groups  1.1.9. Group Actions  1.1.10. Simple and Solvable Groups  1.2. Ring Theory  1.2.1. Rings and Ideals  1.2.2. Ring Homomorphisms  1.2.3. Polynomial Rings  1.2.4. Principal Ideal Domains  1.2.5. Unique Factorization Domains  1.2.6. Noetherian Rings  1.2.7. Artinian Rings  1.3. Field Theory  1.3.1. Field Extensions  1.3.2. Splitting Fields  1.3.3. Galois Theory  1.3.4. Algebraic Closures  1.3.5. Finite Fields  1.3.6. Transcendental Extensions  1.4. Module Theory  1.4.1. Modules over Rings  1.4.2. Free Modules  1.4.3. Module Homomorphisms  1.4.4. Simple and Semi-Simple Modules  1.4.5. Projective Modules  1.4.6. Injective Modules  1.5. Linear Algebra  1.5.1. Vector Spaces  1.5.2. Linear Transformations  1.5.3. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors  1.5.4. Canonical Forms  1.5.5. Inner Product Spaces  1.5.6. Spectral Theorem  1.5.7. Singular Value Decomposition
  2. Analysis  2.1. Real Analysis  2.1.1. Real Numbers and Completeness  2.1.2. Sequences and Series  2.1.3. Continuity  2.1.4. Differentiation  2.1.5. Riemann Integration  2.1.6. Metric Spaces  2.1.7. Lebesgue Measure  2.2. Complex Analysis  2.2.1. Complex Numbers  2.2.2. Analytic Functions  2.2.3. Contour Integration  2.2.4. Cauchy's Theorem  2.2.5. Residue Theorem  2.2.6. Conformal Mappings  2.3. Functional Analysis  2.3.1. Normed Spaces  2.3.2. Banach Spaces  2.3.3. Hilbert Spaces  2.3.4. Linear Operators  2.3.5. Spectral Theory  2.3.6. Compact Operators  2.4. Measure Theory  2.4.1. Sigma Algebras  2.4.2. Measures and Integrals  2.4.3. Lebesgue Integration  2.4.4. Convergence Theorems  2.4.5. Fubini's Theorem  2.5. Harmonic Analysis  2.5.1. Fourier Series  2.5.2. Fourier Transforms  2.5.3. Distribution Theory  2.5.4. Wavelets
  3. Topology  3.1. General Topology  3.1.1. Open and Closed Sets  3.1.2. Continuity  3.1.3. Compactness  3.1.4. Connectedness  3.1.5. Metric Topology  3.2. Algebraic Topology  3.2.1. Fundamental Groups  3.2.2. Homotopy Theory  3.2.3. Homology Theory  3.2.4. Cohomology  3.2.5. Exact Sequences  3.3. Differential Topology  3.3.1. Smooth Manifolds  3.3.2. Tangent Spaces  3.3.3. Vector Fields  3.3.4. Differential Forms
  4. Geometry  4.1. Differential Geometry  4.1.1. Curves and Surfaces  4.1.2. Riemannian Geometry  4.1.3. Geodesics  4.1.4. Curvature  4.2. Algebraic Geometry  4.2.1. Affine and Projective Varieties  4.2.2. Schemes  4.2.3. Divisors and Intersections  4.2.4. Cohomology in Algebraic Geometry  4.3. Computational Geometry  4.3.1. Convex Hulls  4.3.2. Triangulations  4.3.3. Voronoi Diagrams  4.3.4. Geometric Algorithms
  5. Number Theory  5.1. Elementary Number Theory  5.1.1. Divisibility  5.1.2. Congruences  5.1.3. Modular Arithmetic  5.2. Analytic Number Theory  5.2.1. Prime Number Theorem  5.2.2. Dirichlet Series  5.2.3. Zeta and L-functions  5.3. Algebraic Number Theory  5.3.1. Number Fields  5.3.2. Ideals  5.3.3. Class Groups  5.3.4. Galois Representations
  6. Combinatorics  6.1. Enumerative Combinatorics  6.1.1. Generating Functions  6.1.2. Recurrence Relations  6.1.3. Permutations and Combinations  6.2. Graph Theory  6.2.1. Graph Isomorphisms  6.2.2. Planarity  6.2.3. Graph Coloring  6.3. Extremal Combinatorics  6.3.1. Ramsey Theory  6.3.2. Probabilistic Methods in Extremal Combinatorics  6.4. Algebraic Combinatorics  6.4.1. Matrix Methods  6.4.2. Representation Theory
  7. Logic and Foundations  7.1. Set Theory  7.1.1. Zermelo-Fraenkel Axioms  7.1.2. Ordinals and Cardinals  7.2. Model Theory  7.2.1. Structures and Theories in Model Theory  7.2.2. Compactness Theorem  7.3. Proof Theory  7.3.1. Formal Systems  7.3.2. Consistency and Completeness
  8. Probability and Statistics  8.1. Probability Theory  8.1.1. Random Variables  8.1.2. Expectation and Variance  8.1.3. Central Limit Theorem  8.2. Stochastic Processes  8.2.1. Markov Chains  8.2.2. Brownian Motion  8.3. Statistical Inference  8.3.1. Hypothesis Testing  8.3.2. Regression Analysis
  9. Applied Mathematics  9.1. Numerical Analysis  9.1.1. Iterative Methods  9.1.2. Interpolation  9.1.3. Error Analysis  9.2. Partial Differential Equations  9.2.1. Elliptic Equations  9.2.2. Parabolic Equations  9.2.3. Hyperbolic Equations  9.3. Dynamical Systems  9.3.1. Chaos Theory  9.3.2. Stability Analysis in Dynamical Systems

PHD → Algebra → Ring Theory ↓


Noetherian Rings


The study of Noetherian rings stands as a cornerstone in the branch of mathematics known as ring theory, which itself is an important part of algebra. Named after German mathematician Emmy Noether, these rings are central to understanding various structures and phenomena in algebra because of their nice properties.

Noetherian rings have a certain finiteness condition on the ideal structure, which allows mathematicians to gain a deeper understanding of how these rings work. In simple terms, a Noetherian ring is one where every increasing sequence of ideals eventually stops increasing, i.e., becomes stationary. Formally, a ring R is called Noetherian if it satisfies the ascending chain condition (ACC) on ideals, which means that every increasing sequence of ideals I_1 subseteq I_2 subseteq I_3 subseteq ldots eventually becomes stationary.

Characterization of Noetherian rings

Noetherian rings can be understood through various equivalent characterizations:

  • Ascending Chain Condition (ACC): As stated, if every increasing sequence of ideals is constant, then the ring R is Noetherian.
  • Finitely generated ideal: A ring is Noetherian if every ideal is finitely generated. This means that for every ideal I in R, there exists a finite set of elements a_1, a_2, ldots, a_n in R such that every element in I can be expressed as r_1a_1 + r_2a_2 + cdots + r_na_n for some elements r_1, r_2, ldots, r_n in R

These properties show that no infinite ascending chain of ideals can exist without eventually repeating itself, and every ideal can be explained succinctly with a finite set of generators.

Why are Noetherian rings important?

The importance of Noetherian rings extends to algebraic geometry, commutative algebra, and beyond because their finiteness properties make them more amenable to analysis and manipulation. Many important results in algebra are based on this ring being Noetherian.

An example of this is Hilbert's basis theorem, which states that if R is a Noetherian ring, then the polynomial ring R[x] is also Noetherian. This result is very impressive because it ensures that the nice properties of Noetherian rings persist even when going to polynomial extensions, which are central objects in algebra.

Examples of Noetherian rings

Example 1: Integer

The ring of integers mathbb{Z} is a classic example of a Noetherian ring. Every ideal in mathbb{Z} can be generated by a single integer. For example, the ideal (6) consists of all multiples of 6 and is generated by the single element 6.

Model I: (6) ,

Since every ideal can be generated by a single integer, which is finite, mathbb{Z} is Noetherian. This property of being generated by a finite set makes it simple to handle mathematically.

Example 2: Polynomial rings over fields

Consider a polynomial ring k[x], where k is a field (such as mathbb{Q}text{, }mathbb{R}text{, }mathbb{C}). By Hilbert's basis theorem, since k is Noetherian, the polynomial ring k[x] is also Noetherian.

Imagine a sequence of polynomial ideals:

0 subset f_1(x) subset f_1(x), f_2(x) subset ldots

Such a series will be stationary if each polynomial can be expressed using a finite number of basis polynomials.

Example 3: Matrix rings

For more advanced settings, consider matrix rings. Let's take a ring of n times n matrices over a field k, denoted by M_n(k). These rings are also Noetherian. This can be understood intuitively by looking at the transformations represented by these matrices as corresponding to finite systems modeled by polynomials.

Properties of Noetherian rings

Noetherian rings have many favorable properties, making them very useful in a variety of mathematical contexts. Key properties include:

  • Stability under quotients: if R is Noetherian, then any quotient ring R/I is also Noetherian.
  • Consistency under extension: If R is Noetherian and S is a finitely generated R algebra, then S is Noetherian. This extends the concept to modules.
  • Hilbert's basis theorem: As mentioned, if R is Noetherian, then so is R[x]. This theorem is useful in allowing extensions of polynomial rings without loss of Noetherian properties.

Modules over Noetherian rings

The study of modules over Noetherian rings is also rich and rewarding. A module M over a ring R is called Noetherian if it satisfies ACC over submodules. Many properties and theorems for rings extend to modules:

Let us consider a Noetherian R-module M. The structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain (PID) indicates an important analogy between such modules and finite-dimensional vector spaces.

Noetherian domains

Noetherian domains are a special case of Noetherian rings, which are of particular interest in algebraic geometry. A domain is simply a ring with no zero divisors, which ensures a smooth transition to fields.

For example, a Noetherian integral domain that is also a unique factorization domain (UFD) guarantees a particularly familiar factorization notion, similar to prime factorization in the integers.

Visualizing the sustainability of ideals

To build intuition for Noetherian properties, it can be helpful to imagine stabilizing ascending chains of ideals. Imagine each step in the chain of ideals as climbing a stair-step view:

I_1 I_2 I_k

Each step represents a new ideal in the chain; the Noetherian property ensures that you cannot extend the chain to infinity without recurrence, i.e., at some point you are simply sitting on a plateau.

Challenges and open problems

While Noetherian rings are well understood in many aspects, active research continues. One area of investigation involves understanding how these structures behave in different contexts such as non-commutative rings, where the intuition from commutative algebra does not necessarily extend explicitly.

The limitations of Noetherian rings can often be bridged by computational algebraic systems, which solve complex algebraic and geometric problems, highlighting the depth and accessibility of these mathematical concepts in computational environments.

Conclusion

Noetherian rings play a key role in algebra. Their ability to encapsulate complex ideas into manageable, finite structures underlies their role in foundational mathematics. The lasting influence of Emmy Noether's work through these rings continues to influence many aspects of modern mathematical research, prevailing as essential tools in algebraic problem solving and beyond.


PHD → 1.2.6


U
username
0%
completed in PHD

← Prev (1.2.5)
Unique Factorization Domains
Next (1.2.7) →
Artinian Rings

Comments 



Noetherian Rings

https://www.buddymath.com/phd/1.2.6?bmal=en